Phylogenetic of the venomous reptiles is a broadly debated. Many
different classifications previously presented used morphological features to
define clades. The Toxicofera theory was born after genetic testing of the
Squamata order showed serious discrepancies between this morphological grouping
and their genetic relationships (Vidal & Hedges. 2005). Further testing of this group gave greater
support for the new classification of toxicofera based on the genetic
similarities, primarily the presence of venom coding genes within three of the Squamata
groupings (Fry et al. 2009a).
The extant taxa forming this clade includes all Ophidia (snakes), Anguimorpha (lizards
including monitors) and the Iguanians (lizards including dragons, chameleons
and of course iguanas). All the known venomous reptiles belong to this group, however
some families in the group are not venomous. It is thought that the
non-venomous members have simply lost the venom production ability to some degree (Fry et al. 2009a).
New evidence is constantly being uncovered to support this
clade. A study on anguimorphs showed a toxin homologous with those of snakes
and functional venom glands have been discovered in the jaw of Komodo dragons
Varanus komodoensis dispelling the previously held belief that it was only
bacteria that forms the toxic bite by these gargantuous lizard (Fry et al. 2010; Fry et al. 2009b).
The common ancestor to all toxicoferan had a host of core
venom genes. Along with other toxin recruitment, these are the original genes
which have diversified into the venoms we see in many species today (Fry et al. 2009a).
References
Fry, BG, Winter, K, Norman, JA, Roelants, K, Nabuurs, RJA, et al. 2010, ‘Functional and structural
diversification of the Anguimorpha lizard venom system’, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Vol:
9, No: 11, pp. 2369-2390.
Fry, BG, Vidal, N, van der Weerd, L, Kochva, E & Renjifo, C. 2009a, ‘Evolution and diversification of the Toxicofera reptile venom system’, Journal of Proteomics, Vol: 72, No: 2, pp. 127-136.
Fry, BG, Wroe, S, Teeuwisse, W, van Osch, MJP, Moreno, et al. 2009b, ‘A central role for venom
in predation by Varanus komodoensis (Komodo Dragon) and the extinct giant Varanus
(Megalania) priscus’, Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol:106,
No: 22, pp. 8969-8974.
Vidal, N & Hedges, SB. 2005, ‘The phylogeny of squamate
reptiles (lizards, snakes, and amphsbaenians) inferred from nine nuclear
protein-coding genes’, Comptes rendus – Biologies, Vol: 328, No: 10,
pp. 1000-1008.
Image
http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20160226-the-islands-where-dragons-are-real, accessed 5/4/2015
That’s very interesting! So if the production of venom is an ancestral trait, and some species have lost the ability to produce venom, is it just a case of convergent evolution that we see neurotoxins in completely different areas? Why are venoms so common in snakes, but not in lizards?
ReplyDelete